Abstract

We conducted a retrospective review of 221 patients, who underwent spinal oncologic surgery at a tertiary university hospital between 2005 and 2014; in order to identify and validate factors that influence the impact of preoperative embolization of spinal tumours on outcome measures of blood loss and transfusion requirements in spinal oncologic surgery. We also focused on primary tumour type and type of spinal surgery performed. Patients’ electronic and physical records were reviewed to provide demographic data, tumour characteristics, embolization techniques and surgical procedure details. These data were analysed against recorded outcome measures of blood loss (absolute volume and haemoglobin reduction) and transfusion requirements. Forty eight patients who received preoperative embolization were compared against 173 patients who did not. There was a tendency towards reduced blood loss and transfusion requirements in embolized spinal metastases from HCC and thyroid; as well as primary spine tumours, though the differences were not significant. Total embolization of arterial supply to spinal tumours resulted in significantly less blood loss as compared to partial or subtotal embolization. In addition, median blood loss was lower in patients receiving a more proximal embolization and in patients who underwent surgery between 13 and 24h post-embolization despite the insignificant difference. To conclude, preoperative spinal tumour embolization is likely to be effective in reducing blood loss if a total embolization is performed 13–24h prior to the surgery. Similarly, the impact of embolization is likely to be more profound in metastases from HCC, thyroid and primary spine tumours.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call