Abstract
Accuracy for computed tomography (CT) diagnosis of extrapancreatic perineural invasion (EPNI) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which is a significant cause of recurrence, has not been established. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CT in detecting EPNI preoperatively in resectable PDAC of the pancreatic head. Retrospective study design was approved by institutional review board. Preoperative CT-series of 46 patients with resectable PDAC were evaluated by two independent observers. Plexus Pancreaticus Capitalis-II (PPC-II) was assessed as this area is more susceptible for EPNI. All patients underwent surgery with dedicated histopathology, which served as the reference standard. Histologically EPNI was confirmed in 63.1%. Sensitivity of MDCT was 93.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 77.23% to 99.15%), specificity 64.7% (95% CI 38.33% to 85.79%) with area under the curve (AUC) 0.789 for the first observer. Positive predictive value (PPV) was 81.82% (95% CI 70.12% to 89.62%), negative predictive value (NPV—84.62% (95% CI 57.98% to 95.64%) with diagnostic accuracy of 82.61% (95% CI 68.58% to 92.18%). Interobserver agreement showed k-value of 0.893 ({p} < 0.001), which represents very good agreement between observers. Median actual survival in patients without EPNI was 30 months (95% CI 18.284–41.716), in patients with EPNI—13 months (95% CI 12.115–13.885). CT provides sufficient diagnostic information to detect PPC-II invasion in patients with resectable PDAC of the pancreatic head. Preoperative detection of EPNI might be an additional argument to perform neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable PDAC. It should be included in preoperative evaluation form of CT-findings.
Highlights
Accuracy for computed tomography (CT) diagnosis of extrapancreatic perineural invasion (EPNI) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which is a significant cause of recurrence, has not been established
Our findings show that CT is capable to detect the presence of EPNI preoperatively in patients with previously untreated PDAC
CT demonstrates some false positive results, especially in cases when there is no visible contact between the tumor itself and the changes along the inferior pancreatoduodenal artery (IPDA)
Summary
Accuracy for computed tomography (CT) diagnosis of extrapancreatic perineural invasion (EPNI) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which is a significant cause of recurrence, has not been established. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CT in detecting EPNI preoperatively in resectable PDAC of the pancreatic head. Preoperative detection of EPNI might be an additional argument to perform neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable PDAC. The most vulnerable margins are shown to be mesenteric (medial) and posterior usually due to perineural invasion along the plexus surrounding superior mesenteric artery (SMA) This is perhaps not surprising as far as extrapancreatic perineural invasion represents a distinct route of spread in PDAC which is sometimes found even in tumors less than 2 cm in s ize[7].
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
