Abstract

Injurious pecking (IP) represents a serious concern for the welfare of laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). The risk of IP among hens with intact beaks in cage-free housing prompts a need for solutions based on an understanding of underlying mechanisms. In this review, we explore how behavioural programming via prenatal and early postnatal environmental conditions could influence the development of IP in laying hens. The possible roles of early life adversity and mismatch between early life programming and subsequent environmental conditions are considered. We review the role of maternal stress, egg conditions, incubation settings (temperature, light, sound, odour) and chick brooding conditions on behavioural programming that could be linked to IP. Brain and behavioural development can be programmed by prenatal and postnatal environmental conditions, which if suboptimal could lead to a tendency to develop IP later in life, as we illustrate with a Jenga tower that could fall over if not built solidly. If so, steps taken to optimise the environmental conditions of previous generations and incubation conditions, reduce stress around hatching, and guide the early learning of chicks will aid in prevention of IP in commercial laying hen flocks.

Highlights

  • Sul, Brazil Amber Adams Progar, Washington State University, United States Ana C

  • We explore how behavioural programming via prenatal and early postnatal environmental conditions could influence the development of Injurious pecking (IP) in laying hens

  • We review the role of maternal stress, egg conditions, incubation settings and chick brooding conditions on behavioural programming that could be linked to IP

Read more

Summary

THE PROBLEM OF INJURIOUS PECKING IN LAYING HEN CHICKENS

Ethical concerns among consumers in many countries have prompted a move toward housing systems that take the behavioural needs of farm animals into account This has led to a ban on conventional battery cages for laying hens in Europe [1]. Infrared or hot blade treatment is typically performed at hatch or before day 10 of age Both treatments cause pain [9, 10] and can impair beak-related activities [11], such as eating, drinking, and removal of ectoparasites [12]. The involvement of prehatch and early post-hatch factors on the development of IP has been far less studied In both mammals and birds, the embryonic environment can exert strong and long-lasting effects on offspring behaviour. We review how behavioural programming via prenatal and early postnatal conditions could influence the development of IP in laying hens

Programming Effects
HYPOTHESES ABOUT HOW PRENATAL BEHAVIOURAL PROGRAMMING COULD INFLUENCE IP
Programming in Chickens
CORT implant
Epigenetic Modifications and Inheritance
INCUBATION EFFECTS ON BEHAVIOURAL PROGRAMMING IN CHICKENS
Effects of Light During Incubation
Effects of Temperature During Incubation
Auditory Imprinting During Incubation
Olfactory Conditioning During Incubation
Findings
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call