Abstract
This paper presents the procedures used and the major findings of a study which analyzed potential training problems associated with a conceptual weapon system. The training analysis was conducted on five generic weapon system alternatives, virtually every type of fielded and developing system which could be related to the conceptual system. The methodologial approach was designed to provide converging evidence for the reliability and validity of the overall results from up to four independent sources of information and data analysis techniques. The four approaches addressed, respectively, personnel resource requirements, training resource requirements, behavioral requirements of hardware-driven tasks, and soldier perceptions of training adequacy. The results of these analyses led to the construction of matrices which permitted comparisons among the five generic systems. These comparisons led, in turn, to a set of recommendations, based on training considerations alone, for a preferred conceptual system alternative.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
