Abstract

Pathological microscopic image is regarded as a gold standard for the diagnosis of disease, and eye tracking technology is considered as a very effective tool for medical education. It will be very interesting if we use the eye tracking to predict where pathologists or doctors and persons with no or little experience look at the pathological microscopic image. In the current work, we first establish a pathological microscopic image database with the eye movement data of experts and nonexperts (PMIDE), including a total of 425 pathological microscopic images. The statistical analysis is afterwards conducted on PMIDE to analyze the difference in eye movement behavior between experts and nonexperts. The results show that although there is no significant difference in general, the experts focus on a broader scope than nonexperts. This inspires us to respectively develop saliency models for experts and nonexperts. Furthermore, the existing 10 saliency models are tested on PMIDE, and the performance of these models are all unacceptable with AUC, CC, NSS and SAUC below 0.73, 0.47, 0.78 and 0.52, respectively. This study indicates that the saliency models specific to pathological microscopic images urgent need to be developed using our database—PMIDE or the other related databases.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.