Abstract

To study the nuclear structure of neutron-rich titanium isotopes, a lifetime measurement was performed at the Grand Accélérateur National d'Ions Lourds (GANIL) facility in Caen, France. The nucleiwere produced in a multinucleon-transfer reaction by using a 6.76 MeV/u 238U beam. The Advanced Gamma Tracking Array (AGATA) was employed for the γ-ray detection and target-like recoils were identified event-by-event by the large-acceptance variable mode spectrometer (VAMOS++). Preliminary level lifetimes of the (5/2−) to 13/2− states of the yrast band in the neutron-rich nucleus 53Ti were measured for the first time employing the recoil distance Doppler-shift (RDDS) method and the compact plunger for deep inelastic reactions. The differential decay curve method (DDCM) was used to obtain the lifetimes from the RDDS data.

Highlights

  • The Advanced Gamma Tracking Array (AGATA) was employed for the γ-ray detection and target-like recoils were identified event-by-event by the large-acceptance variable mode spectrometer (VAMOS++)

  • Preliminary level lifetimes of the (5/2−) to 13/2− states of the yrast band in the neutron-rich nucleus 53Ti were measured for the first time employing the recoil distance Doppler-shift (RDDS) method and the compact plunger for deep inelastic reactions

  • The nuclear structure in the region of neutron-rich Ti isotopes is of enhanced interest due to the observed features hinting at subshell closures at N = 32, 34 [1]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The nuclear structure in the region of neutron-rich Ti isotopes is of enhanced interest due to the observed features hinting at subshell closures at N = 32, 34 [1]. In neutron-rich 50−56Ti isotopes the staggering of the excitation energies for the 2+1 state points to emergence of subshells. The knowledge was extended by studies performed at the Gammasphere spectrometer [3] to identify the 53Ti yrast cascade for the first time and to determine the excitation energy of states with spins up to Iπ = 21/2−. The experimental yrast structure was compared with shellmodel calculations where the experimental data are well described by calculations using the GXPF1 and GXPF1A interactions [3].

Experimental Details
Data analysis and results
Summary
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call