Abstract
ABSTRACT The decision of either preserving a member or primary amputation (PA) in severe extremity trauma, especially in the presence of fractures, vascular injuries or serious injuries of soft tissues has always been a challenge for the trauma surgeon. The initial assessment with objective criteria like indexes, such as the Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) or the PSI, can aid in the differentiation of members that can be saved or should be amputated primarily. We report on the design and preliminary results of our ongoing prospective study analyzing laboratory test as predictors of amputation in severe lower limb trauma. Materials and methods All patients treated in our emergency department with severe lower limb trauma and open fractures (classified as Gustilo III) were included in this study. We collected blood for laboratory test of all patients at admission. All injured limb were photographed for posterior analysis and MESS classification. Results From March 15, 2012, to June 10, 2012, n = 20 patients were included in our study. PA was performed in eight (40%) and preserving procedures (PP) in 12 (60%). Mean age was 30 in PP group and 40.5 in PA. Mean systolic pressure at the emergency room was 130 mm Hg in PP and 107 mm Hg in PA. MESS index was calculated for all patients and the means were 5 for the PP group and 8 for the PA group. Laboratory test of the two groups were compared and statistically analyzed. Acidosis, arterial lactate levels and hemoglobin levels at admission had a statistical difference between the two groups: pH = 7.36 PP vs 7.18 PA (p = 0.001); lactate: PP = 25 vs PA = 63 (p < 0.001); hemoglobin: PP = 13.6 vs PA = 7.85 (p = 0.03). Conclusion Laboratory results of tests collected during initial assessment of patients with severe lower limb trauma are different between those submitted to PA or a PP. How to cite this article Garcia DFV, de Sá RRC, Bernini CO, Rasslan S . Preliminary Results of a Prospective Study on Severe Lower Limb Trauma: Analysis of Laboratory Tests as Predictors of Amputation. Panam J Trauma Critical Care Emerg Surg 2013;2(1):58-61.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: Panamerican Journal of Trauma, Critical Care & Emergency Surgery
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.