Abstract

The current study was conducted to compare neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with concurrent chemotherapy for efficacy, toxicities and compliance of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Eligible patients were randomized to NACT + radiotherapy (RT) + adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) arm or concurrent chemoradiotherapy(CCRT) + AC arm. Two arms received same conventional RT at a planned dose of 70 Gy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy comprised cisplatin 90 mg/m(2) (30 mg/m(2)/day) and 5-fluorouracil 1,500 mg/m(2) (500 mg/m(2)/day) over 3 days for two 21-day cycles. The same regimen at equal dosage was administered on the 1st and 22nd days of the radiotherapy as concurrent chemotherapy. Four cycles of the same chemotherapy regimen were given to both two arms as AC. A total of 338 NPC patients were recruited. 170 patients were randomized to NACT arm and 168 patients to CCRT arm. The median duration of follow-up was 38 months. The 3-year OS and DFS rates were 95.9 versus 94.5% (P = 0.54) and 78.5 versus 82.5% (P = 0.16), respectively, in NACT and CCRT arms. An unplanned subgroup analysis according to the N-classification suggested that CCRT improves MFS in patients with N0-1 disease (80.1 vs. 94.9%, P = 0.034). Among the acute toxicities observed, the rates of grade 3/4 mucositis (52.4 vs. 35.9% P = 0.023) and vomiting (13.7 vs. 4.7% P = 0.000) were significantly higher in CCRT arm. Our preliminary results only showed an advantage of CCRT over NACT in NPC patients with limited N disease in MFS. More acute toxicities were observed in CCRT arm and a trend of better tolerance was observed in NACT arm.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.