Abstract

Preliminary Experiments on Human Sensitivity to Rhythmic Structure in a Grammar with Recursive Self-Similarity.

Highlights

  • Processing of hierarchical structures has been proposed as a uniquely human ability, a hallmark of the linguistic system that distinguishes human language from animal communication systems (Hauser et al, 2002; Martins, 2012)

  • Our results indicate that for the majority of our participants, rhythm alone may not be enough to learn this type of grammar; musical background, age, instruction, and the specific types of foil grammars may all be contributing factors

  • Two experiments were conducted, using Fibonacci grammars similar to those used in Saddy (2009) and Shirley (2014)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Processing of hierarchical structures has been proposed as a uniquely human ability, a hallmark of the linguistic system that distinguishes human language from animal communication systems (Hauser et al, 2002; Martins, 2012). Artificial Grammar Learning experiments have shown that adult participants are able to learn the context-free grammar AnBn, whose generation requires hierarchical rules, even without the need for semantic information (Lai and Poletiek, 2013). Parsing and generalizing grammars like AnBn requires detection that a structure, e.g., AB, is embedded between elements of another structure, e.g., A...B. Other species have not been shown unequivocally to be able to learn on the basis of the center-embedding principle required of AnBn (rather than using other strategies, Corballis, 2007; van Heijningen et al, 2009; Beckers et al, 2012; Poletiek et al, 2015; Ravignani et al, 2015), which is taken as evidence that processing of recursion is a human-specific capacity.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call