Abstract

Background: Foot–ankle motion is affected by chronic ankle instability (CAI) in terms of altered kinematics. This study focuses on multisegmental foot–ankle motion and joint coupling in barefoot and taped CAI patients during the three subphases of stance at running. Methods: Foot segmental motion data of 12 controls and 15 CAI participants during running with a heel strike pattern were collected through gait analysis. CAI participants performed running trials in three conditions: barefoot running, and running with high-dye and low-dye taping. Dependent variables were the range of motion (RoM) occurring at the different inter-segment angles as well as the cross-correlation coefficients between predetermined segments. Results: There were no significant RoM differences for barefoot running between CAI patients and controls. In taped conditions, the first two subphases only showed RoM changes at the midfoot without apparent RoM reduction compared to the barefoot CAI condition. In the last subphase there was limited RoM reduction at the mid- and rearfoot. Cross-correlation coefficients highlighted a tendency towards weaker joint coupling in the barefoot CAI condition compared to the controls. Joint coupling within the taped CAI conditions did not show optimization compared to the barefoot CAI condition. Conclusions: RoM was not significantly changed for barefoot running between CAI patients and controls. In taped conditions, there was no distinct tendency towards lower mean RoM values due to the mechanical restraints of taping. Joint coupling in CAI patients was not optimized by taping.

Highlights

  • Given the potential influence of taping on range of motion (RoM) and joint coupling, this study addressed multisegmental foot–ankle motion and joint coupling in barefoot-taped chronic ankle instability (CAI) subjects during different subphases of the stance phase of running

  • Inclusion criteria for the CAI group were (1) a history of at least one significant ankle sprain and (2) a history of the ankle joint giving way as defined by Delahunt et al [20]. This self-reported ankle instability was objectivated with the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) [21], a validated ankle instability-specific questionnaire using a cut-off benchmark of ≤24 to define CAI

  • There were some significant differences in spatio-temporal parameters between the control group and the CAI barefoot (CAI_BF) condition

Read more

Summary

Introduction

LAS have a great tendency for developing long-term complaints mostly caused by chronic ankle instability (CAI) [3]. Foot–ankle motion is affected by chronic ankle instability (CAI) in terms of altered kinematics. This study focuses on multisegmental foot–ankle motion and joint coupling in barefoot and taped CAI patients during the three subphases of stance at running. Results: There were no significant RoM differences for barefoot running between CAI patients and controls. The first two subphases only showed RoM changes at the midfoot without apparent RoM reduction compared to the barefoot CAI condition. Cross-correlation coefficients highlighted a tendency towards weaker joint coupling in the barefoot CAI condition compared to the controls. Conclusions: RoM was not significantly changed for barefoot running between CAI patients and controls. Joint coupling in CAI patients was not optimized by taping

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call