Abstract

South Korea has universal health coverage guaranteeing equitable healthcare for all. However, equity issues have been raised regarding hemodialysis reimbursement for medical aid recipients with chronic kidney disease. Physicians and civic groups demanded a revision of the discriminatory policy, and in response, the Ministry of Health and Welfare amended the hemodialysis case payment scheme. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the reform and detect any unintended policy outcomes. Data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service of Korea was used. All subjects were patients with chronic kidney disease who received outpatient hemodialysis and medical aid from April 2017 to March 2022. The data was analyzed with descriptive statistics, and the generalized estimation equation was used to control for covariates and identify policy effects. The reform of the case payment scheme in 2021 raised the compensation level per hemodialysis case, which was fixed for 7 years from 2014, by approximately 2,000 Korean won. There was no negative effect such as additional expenditure resulting from an unintentional increase in medical use. A year has passed since the implementation of the outpatient hemodialysis rate system reform for medical aid recipients. Our results indicate that the reform has gone smoothly, and we anticipate continuous efforts by the government to guarantee universal health coverage to medical aid recipients. Through such consistent endeavors to correct the discriminatory aspects of policies, South Korea will achieve true universal health coverage.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.