Preliminary Data on the Rural‐Urban Commuting Area Codes for the ALLFTD Cohort

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe rural‐urban commuting area (RUCA) codes classify communities using measures of population density, urbanization, and daily commuting from U.S. Census Bureau information. The ARTFL LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD) study generated RUCA codes for enrolled participants to better understand our cohort demographics. The rural‐urban distribution of participants may provide important insights for clinical trial planning.MethodsThe current RUCA codes are generated from the 2010 decennial census and the 2006‐10 American Community Survey data. The codes are numbers (1‐10) that describe metropolitan, micropolitan, small town, and rural commuting areas based on the size and direction of the primary (largest) commuting flows.ResultsRUCA codes were generated on 784 ALLFTD participants. At their most recent visit, participant median age was 60, 51.1% female, and a median education of 16 years. Participants were classified as clinically normal (39.1%), behavioral variant FTD (25%), nonfluent PPA (6.7%), semantic variant PPA (6.6%), PSP (4.7%), MBCI (4.8%), corticobasal syndrome (5.9%), and the remaining 7% of participants had other dementia‐related diagnoses. For participants with sporadic disease, 87.4% live in a metropolitan area, 6.7% a micropolitan area, 3.2% a small‐town area, and 3.2% live in a rural area. In familial FTLD, a larger percentage of participants live in micropolitan or small town/rural community (18.8% combined; p = 0.029), driven largely by MAPT family participants (n = 101). 10% of those with a familial MAPT mutation live in a rural area; with an additional 18% in micropolitan (12.9%) or small‐town areas (5%). Among those with a familial C9orf72 expansion, 83.3% live in a metropolitan area, 8.9% micropolitan area, 5.6% in a small‐town area, and 2.2% in a rural area. Participants with a familial GRN mutation show a similar distribution: 84.7% live in a metropolitan area, 5.6% micropolitan, 6.9% small‐town, 2.8% rural.ConclusionsAdditional analyses to better understand if FTD families are disproportionately living in rural communities are underway. These analyses will better characterize sporadic and familial FTD demographics to assist with clinical trial design.