Abstract

The determination of the nonlinear response of structural members subjected to a close-in explosive threat is challenging. There are various ways to quantify the blast resistance and mode of failure of a structural member, e.g. experimental testing which is expensive and time-consuming, or high-fidelity finite element analysis which is also time-consuming. The familiar analytical approach using an equivalent single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) system is much less costly, however, as will be shown in this paper, may lack accuracy. Based on an extensive study of the nonlinear response of a ground-floor column of a high-rise building subjected to close-in explosive threat, using nonlinear explicit finite element analysis as well as analytical single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) system approach, the source of inaccuracy of the analytical approach is identified, and an empirical approach using Multivariable Polynomial Regression (MPR) is established. The paper presents a head-to-head comparison of the results produced by finite element analysis, the SDOF system analysis, the empirical approach, and experimental test data to emphasize the accuracy and time-efficiency of the proposed approach. The approach has the potential to establish itself as a time-efficient preliminary vulnerability assessment methodology of structural members subjected to close-in blast loading.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.