Abstract
This paper addresses a previous claim (Brysbaert & Praet, 1992) that the use of prelexical phonology in visual word recognition is optional in the Dutch language. One backward masking experiment and two masked priming experiments are reported. The experimental task was perceptual identification. Pseudohomophones, graphemic controls, and unrelated controls of the target words were used as masks or primes. The main findings were (1) unlike previous claims, the pseudohomophone effect is not strategic in Dutch, but (2) the effect is more clearly obtained with the masked priming procedure than with the backward masking procedure.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
