Abstract
AimTo illustrate the pre‐hospital management arsenals and protocols in different EMS units, and to estimate the perceived difficulty of diagnosing suspected acute heart failure (AHF) compared with other common pre‐hospital conditions.Methods and resultsA multinational survey included 104 emergency medical service (EMS) regions from 18 countries. Diagnostic and therapeutic arsenals related to AHF management were reported for each type of EMS unit. The prevalence and contents of management protocols for common medical conditions treated pre‐hospitally was collected. The perceived difficulty of diagnosing AHF and other medical conditions by emergency medical dispatchers and EMS personnel was interrogated.Ultrasound devices and point‐of‐care testing were available in advanced life support and helicopter EMS units in fewer than 25% of EMS regions. AHF protocols were present in 80.8% of regions. Protocols for ST‐elevation myocardial infarction, chest pain, and dyspnoea were present in 95.2, 80.8, and 76.0% of EMS regions, respectively. Protocolized diagnostic actions for AHF management included 12‐lead electrocardiogram (92.1% of regions), ultrasound examination (16.0%), and point‐of‐care testings for troponin and BNP (6.0 and 3.5%). Therapeutic actions included supplementary oxygen (93.2%), non‐invasive ventilation (80.7%), intravenous furosemide, opiates, nitroglycerine (69.0, 68.6, and 57.0%), and intubation 71.5%. Diagnosing suspected AHF was considered easy to moderate by EMS personnel and moderate to difficult by emergency medical dispatchers (without significant differences between de novo and decompensated heart failure). In both settings, diagnosis of suspected AHF was considered easier than pulmonary embolism and more difficult than ST‐elevation myocardial infarction, asthma, and stroke.ConclusionsThe prevalence of AHF protocols is rather high but the contents seem to vary. Difficulty of diagnosing suspected AHF seems to be moderate compared with other pre‐hospital conditions.
Highlights
Acute heart failure (AHF) is a common medical condition encountered in the emergency departments (ED) and pre-hospital settings.[1,2]
These regional emergency medical services (EMS) leaders were contacted by key national emergency physicians who agreed to participate in the present study
The population coverage ranged from 2.2–13.2% in Canada, Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, Poland, Slovenia, and United states
Summary
Acute heart failure (AHF) is a common medical condition encountered in the emergency departments (ED) and pre-hospital settings.[1,2] From 11–53% of AHF patients arrive to the ED by ambulance.[3,4,5] While the prognosis of AHF patients’ remains poor,[6,7,8,9] the importance of early phase and pre-hospital management by emergency medical services (EMS) has been recently underlined.[10,11,12,13]. EMS units are categorized by their resources for diagnosis and care and the level of personnel. Advanced life support (ALS) units have a physician, nurse, or paramedic aboard (depending on the country) with readiness for intravenous (IV) line insertion and IV-medication administration. Most helicopter EMS (HEMS) units correspond to this category. Basic life support (BLS) units are usually resourced and staffed for less critical situations
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
