Abstract
Two-hundred and eleven Irish GPs responded to a questionnaire survey of their experience and management of acute myocardial infarction (MI) and their attitudes to the use of thrombolytic therapy Three-quarters of the respondents felt they dealt with three or more MIs per year; most felt that the majority of MIs were initially seen by a GP. Diagnosis is based on clinical findings; only 11% routinely take an ECG. Management is largely oriented to relief of pain but intravenous narcotics are only used by a minority. Hospital referral for suspected acute MI was the preferred choice for almost all GPs in a variety of patient-care scenarios. Home care for MI was chosen only for a minority of elderly patients when some hours had elapsed since the onset of symptoms. Definitive guidelines on the pre-hospital use of thrombolysis are not yet available. However, eighty per cent of respondents in this study feel that thrombolysis is beneficial and many feel that it has value in the pre-hospital situation. Respondents identified educational, organisational and financial problems to be overcome before this could happen.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
