Abstract

ObjectiveTo assess the frequency and perinatal outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) defined by the criteria according to the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) diagnostic criteria for GDM.DesignA retrospective cohort study.SettingSix secondary and tertiary delivery hospitals in Finland in 2009.PopulationPregnant women (N = 4,033) and their offspring.MethodsWe used data on comprehensive screening of pregnant women with a 2-h 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), performed between gestational weeks 24 and 40. OGTT glucose concentrations were used to identify women who fulfilled IADPSG and NICE criteria. While cut-offs according to Finnish national criteria partly overlapped with both criteria, a subgroup of IADPSG- or NICE-positive GDM women remained undiagnosed by Finnish criteria and hence non-treated. They were analysed as subgroups and compared to controls who were negative with all cut-offs.Main outcome measuresGDM prevalence, birth weight SD score (BWSDS), large for gestational age (LGA) and caesarean section (CS) rates.ResultsAmong the 4,033 women screened for GDM, 1,249 (31.0%) and 529 (13.1%) had GDM according to the IADPSG and NICE criteria, respectively. The LGA rate was similar in both groups. Regardless of the diagnostic criteria, women with GDM had a higher risk of induced delivery and CSs than controls. In IADPSG-positive non-treated women, offspring’s BWSDS and CS rate were higher than in controls.ConclusionsGDM prevalence was 2.4-fold higher according to the IADPSG compared with the NICE criteria but the LGA rate did not differ. BWSDS and CS rate were increased already with mild untreated hyperglycaemia.

Highlights

  • The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) varies, depending on the screening methods and diagnostic cut-off values applied

  • Among the 4,033 women screened for GDM, 1,249 (31.0%) and 529 (13.1%) had GDM according to the IADPSG and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) criteria, respectively

  • GDM prevalence was 2.4-fold higher according to the IADPSG compared with the NICE criteria but the large for gestational age (LGA) rate did not differ

Read more

Summary

Objective

To assess the frequency and perinatal outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) defined by the criteria according to the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) diagnostic criteria for GDM

Methods
Results
Introduction
Discussion
Strengths and limitations
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call