Pregnancy intention and preconception contraceptive behaviors and substandard prenatal care in France.

Abstract

Evaluate the association between a combined measure of time-based pregnancy intention and preconception contraceptive behavior and suboptimal prenatal care. women delivering a live birth in all maternity units during one week in March 2016 were interviewed in the postpartum ward (N=13132). Multinomial logistic regression models were used to assess the association between the indicator of pregnancy intention and substandard prenatal care (late initiation of care and less than the recommended number of prenatal visits (<60% recommended)). 83.6% of women had timed pregnancies, 4.7% had mistimed pregnancies but discontinued contraception to conceive, 8.0% had mistimed pregnancies without discontinuing contraception to conceive and 3.7% had unwanted pregnancies. Women with timed pregnancies or mistimed pregnancies despite discontinuing contraception to conceive were more socially advantaged than those who had an unwanted pregnancy or a mistimed pregnancy without discontinuing contraception to conceive. 3.3% of women had a substandard number of prenatal visits and 2.5% had delayed prenatal care initiation. The adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of substandard prenatal visits were high among women with unwanted pregnancies (aOR=2.78; 95% confidence interval [1.91-4.05]) and women with mistimed pregnancies who had not discontinued contraception to conceive (aOR=1.69; [1.21-2.35]) compared to women with timed pregnancies. No difference was observed for women with mistimed pregnancies who discontinued contraception to conceive (aOR=1.22; [0.70-2.12]). Using routinely collected information on preconception contraception allows a more nuanced assessment of pregnancy intentions that can help caregivers identify women at greater risk of substandard prenatal care.