Abstract
The mechanisms of adaptation of uterine artery vascular tone to pregnancy are not fully understood. The present study tested the hypothesis that pregnancy decreases the PKC-mediated Ca(2+) sensitivity of the contractile process and attenuates myogenic tone in resistance-sized uterine arteries. In pressurized uterine arteries from nonpregnant (NPUA) and near-term pregnant (PUA) sheep, we measured, simultaneously in the same tissue, vascular diameter and vessel wall intracellular Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) as a function of intraluminal pressure. In both NPUA and PUA, membrane depolarization with KCl caused a rapid increase in [Ca(2+)](i) and a decrease in diameter. A pressure increase from 20 to 100 mmHg resulted in a transient increase in diameter that was associated with an increase in [Ca(2+)](i), followed by myogenic contractions in the absence of further changes in [Ca(2+)](i). In addition, activation of PKC by phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate induced a decrease in diameter in the absence of changes in [Ca(2+)](i). Pressure-dependent myogenic responses were significantly decreased in PUA compared with NPUA. However, pressure-induced increases in [Ca(2+)](i) were not significantly different between PUA and NPUA. The ratio of changes in diameter to changes in [Ca(2+)](i) was significantly greater for pressure-induced contraction of NPUA than that of PUA. Inhibition of PKC by calphostin C significantly attenuated the pressure-induced vascular tone and eliminated the difference of myogenic responses between NPUA and PUA. In contrast, the MAPKK (MEK) inhibitor PD-098059 had no effect on NPUA but significantly enhanced myogenic responses of PUA. In the presence of PD-098059, there was no difference in pressure-induced myogenic responses between NPUA and PUA. The results suggest that pregnancy downregulates pressure-dependent myogenic tone of the uterine artery, which is partly due to increased MEK/ERK activity and decreased PKC signal pathway leading to a decrease in Ca(2+) sensitivity of myogenic mechanism in the uterine artery during pregnancy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.