Abstract

There are limited data on whether pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery is durable after subsequent delivery. The aims of this study were to evaluate the safety and durability of POP surgery after delivery and to describe the medical decision-making and clinical outcomes of patients who gave birth after POP surgery. This study is a retrospective case series of patients who underwent surgery for symptomatic POP between 2007 and 2017, and subsequently had a live birth. Twenty patients were identified. Seventeen patients underwent posterior colporrhaphy, 10 anterior colporrhaphy, and 5 apical suspensions. The mean interval between POP surgery and the first delivery was 28.6 months. One patient endorsed recurrent POP symptoms before pregnancy, and none of the remaining 19 patients reported recurrent POP symptoms before or during pregnancy. There were no pregnancy complications related to the POP surgery. Nine patients underwent cesarean delivery (CD). Four patients were counseled to have a CD due to their prior POP surgery, 3 patients had an elective primary CD due to the POP surgery, 1 patient chose an elective repeat CD, and 1 patient had a CD due to obstructed labor. Urogynecologists were consulted for delivery recommendations for 6 patients and recommended CD for 3 of them. Eleven patients had spontaneous vaginal delivery. Three patients reported recurrent POP symptoms after delivery. Our findings corroborate previous case series demonstrating the safety and durability of POP surgery during and after pregnancy. More than 75% of patients gave birth by CD, which was due to physician or patient concerns regarding the prior POP surgery.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call