Abstract

Social-evaluative threat (SET) – a situation in which one could be negatively evaluated by others – elicits profound (psycho)physiological reactivity which, if chronically present and not adaptively regulated, has deleterious effects on mental and physical health. Decreased self-awareness and increased other-awareness are understood to be an adaptive response to SET. Attentional deployment – the process of selectively attending to certain aspects of emotional stimuli to modulate emotional reactivity – is supported by fronto-parietal and fronto-limbic networks, with the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex being a central hub. The primary aim of the current study was to investigate the effects of active (versus sham) prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on self and other-attentional deployment during the exposure to a SET context. Seventy-four female participants received active or sham tDCS and were subsequently exposed to a rigged social feedback paradigm. In this paradigm a series of social evaluations were presented together with a photograph of the supposed evaluator and a self- photograph of the participant, while gaze behavior (time to first fixation, total fixation time) and skin conductance responses (SCRs; a marker of emotional reactivity) were measured. For half of the evaluations, participants could anticipate the valence (negative or positive) of the evaluation a priori. Analyses showed that participants receiving active tDCS were (a) slower to fixate on their self-photograph, (b) spent less time fixating on their self-photograph, and (c) spent more time fixating on the evaluator photograph. During unanticipated evaluations, active tDCS was associated with less time spent fixating on the evaluation. Furthermore, among those receiving active tDCS, SCRs were attenuated as a function of slower times to fixate on the self-photograph. Taken together, these results suggest that in a context of SET, prefrontal tDCS decreases self-attention while increasing other-attention, and that attenuated self-referential attention specifically may be a neurocognitive mechanism through which tDCS reduces emotional reactivity. Moreover, the results suggest that tDCS reduces vigilance toward stimuli that possibly convey threatening information, corroborating past research in this area.

Highlights

  • Social interactions make up a substantial part of our lives and the need to belong is a fundamental drive in human behavior (Baumeister and Leary, 1995)

  • Follow-up pairwise comparisons probing the effect of group for each area of interest (AOI) showed that active Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) was associated with a slower time to fixate on the self-photograph, b = 0.10, SE = 0.05, z = 1.91, p = 0.03

  • Follow-up pairwise comparisons investigating the effect of group on each AOI and type showed that active tDCS was associated with a slower time to fixate on the self-photograph during both the presentation of anticipated, b = 0.11, SE = 0.06, z = 1.91, p = 0.03, and non-anticipated evaluations, b = 0.10, SE = 0.06, z = 1.71, p = 0.04

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Social interactions make up a substantial part of our lives and the need to belong is a fundamental drive in human behavior (Baumeister and Leary, 1995). An important mechanism underlying depression is assumed to be the presence of attentional biases toward negative selfreferent information and difficulties to shift attention away from this information, thereby contributing to sustained negative self-referential processing and perpetuating depressive mood (Koster et al, 2011; Joormann and Vanderlind, 2014). Consistent with this view, studies have shown that the ability to disengage attention away from negative information prospectively predicts the onset of depressive symptoms via repetitive negative selfreferential thinking (Sanchez-Lopez et al, 2019c; Yaroslavsky et al, 2019). The prefrontal cortex plays an essential role in a wide range of psychological processes related to cognitive flexibility, emotional processing and emotion regulatory processes (Ochsner and Gross, 2005; Kim et al, 2011; Stuss, 2011)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call