Abstract

Developing countries are increasingly impacted by floods, especially in Asia. Traditional flood risk management, using structural measures such as levees, can have negative impacts on the livelihoods of social groups that are more vulnerable. Ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA) provides a complementary approach that is potentially more inclusive of groups that are commonly described as more vulnerable, such as the poor and women. However, there is a lack of disaggregated and quantitative information on the potential of EbA to support vulnerable groups of society. This paper provides a quantitative analysis of the differences in vulnerability to flooding as well as preferences for EbA benefits across income groups and gender. We use data collected through a survey of households in urban and rural Central Vietnam which included a discrete choice experiment on preferences for ecosystem services. A total of 1,010 households was surveyed during 2017 through a random sampling approach. Preferences are measured in monetary and non-monetary terms to avoid issues that may arise from financial constraints faced by respondents and especially the more vulnerable groups. Our results reveal that lower income households and women are overall more vulnerable than their counterparts and have stronger preferences for the majority of the EbA benefits, including flood protection, seafood abundance, tourism, and recreation suitability. These findings strongly indicate that EbA is indeed a promising tool to support groups of society that are especially vulnerable to floods. These results provide crucial insights for future implementation of EbA projects and for the integration of EbA with goals targeted at complying with the Sendai Framework and Sustainable Development Goals.

Highlights

  • Floods are amongst the most devastating natural hazards (UNDRR, 2020)

  • This paper provides a quantitative analysis of the differences in vulnerability to flooding as well as preferences for Ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA) benefits across income groups and gender

  • By combining our empirical results on the vulnerability to floods and preferences for EbA with existing knowledge, we argue on the potential relevance of EbA in reducing the vulnerability of the more vulnerable through poverty alleviation and improvements in gender equality

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Floods are amongst the most devastating natural hazards (UNDRR, 2020). Climate change in combination with socioeconomic development is expected to result in increased flood risks (IPCC, 2012; IPCC, 2014). Asia has been heavily affected by flooding. More than 60 percent of the total global economic losses due to flooding between 1980 and 2015 occurred in Asia, according to the EM-DAT database (Bubeck et al, 2017). A single typhoon (Damrey) in November 2017 resulted in ~110 deaths and a loss of USD 650 million across the Philippines and Vietnam (Munich Re, 2018). Developing countries are generally more vulnerable to floods due to their limited capacity to prevent and absorb the effects of these disasters

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call