Abstract

In the modern era of the mobile apps (the era of surveillance capitalism - as termed by Shoshana Zuboff) huge quantities of surveillance data about consumers and their activities offer a wave of opportunities for economic and societal value creation. ln-app advertising - a multi-billion dollar industry, is an essential part of the current digital ecosystem driven by free mobile applications, where the ecosystem entities usually comprise consumer apps, their clients (consumers), ad-networks, and advertisers. Sensitive consumer information is often being sold downstream in this ecosystem without the knowledge of consumers, and in many cases to their annoyance. While this practice, in cases, may result in long-term benefits for the consumers, it can result in serious information privacy breaches of very significant impact (e.g., breach of genetic data) in the short term. The question we raise through this paper is: Is it economically feasible to trade consumer personal information with their formal consent (permission) and in return provide them incentives (monetary or otherwise)?. In view of (a) the behavioral assumption that humans are `compromising' beings and have privacy preferences, (b) privacy as a good not having strict boundaries, and (c) the practical inevitability of inappropriate data leakage by data holders downstream in the data-release supply-chain, we propose a design of regulated efficient/bounded inefficient economic mechanisms for oligopoly data trading markets using a novel preference function bidding approach on a simplified sellers-broker market. Our methodology preserves the heterogeneous privacy preservation constraints (at a grouped consumer, i.e., app, level) upto certain compromise levels, and at the same time satisfies information demand (via the broker) of agencies (e.g., advertising organizations) that collect client data for the purpose of targeted behavioral advertising.

Highlights

  • Mobile applications are driving a major portion of the modern digital society, including business small and large as well as the state-of-the-art IoT/CPS systems. ln-app advertising is an essential part of this digital ecosystem of mostly free mobile applications, where the ecosystem entities comprise the consumers, consumer apps, ad-networks, advertisers, and retailers

  • We model a privacy trading ecosystem setting as a supply-demand market consisting of (i) market competing data holders (DHs) representing app firms with locked-in consumer base and (ii) a single ad-network acting as a data broker between the app firms and the advertisers

  • We show in Section V that for the problem at hand, our proposed supply function mechanism for privacy trading is optimal over a feasible family of mechanisms

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Mobile applications (apps) are driving a major portion of the modern digital society, including business small and large as well as the state-of-the-art IoT/CPS systems. ln-app advertising is an essential part of this digital ecosystem of mostly free mobile applications, where the ecosystem entities comprise the consumers, consumer apps, ad-networks, advertisers, and retailers. Ln-app advertising is an essential part of this digital ecosystem of mostly free mobile applications, where the ecosystem entities comprise the consumers, consumer apps, ad-networks, advertisers, and retailers. Ranjan Pal et al.: Preference-Based Privacy Markets of entities (e.g., enterprises, apps, databoxes) that aggregate and sell consumer data and those (e.g., ad-networks, retailers) that buy this data from the latter, (b) interests of consumer behavior targeting advertising firms, and (c) preserving consumer side information privacy (IP). The basic requirement for this ‘win-win’ ecosystem to exist in the first place, is the flow of personalized information from the consumer to the advertisers and retailers via the ad-networks (or directly from consumer to the advertisers/retailers) for effective/profitable ad placements, that subsequently motivate the latter to collect personal data about consumers via apps. Before we lay down research contributions with respect to such markets, we provide an explanation of why such markets are a need of the day despite privacy concerns raised due to IP commercialization

NEED FOR FAIR PRIVACY COMMERCIALIZATION
RESEARCH CONTRIBUTIONS
RELATED LITERATURE
MARKETS ANALYSES
CHARACTERIZING EFFICIENCY LOSS AT ONE
OPTIMALITY OF OUR MECHANISM CHOICE
COMPUTATIONAL EVALUATION
EVALUATION RESULTS
VIII. PROOFS OF THEOREMS Proof of Theorem 1
On the other hand for any qi
CONTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call