Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine physician attitudes regarding voluntary versus mandatory status of human immunodeficiency virus testing in pregnant women. STUDY DESIGN: A questionnaire was sent to a sampling of the membership in District IX of The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Members were queried about experience with pregnant patients who were human immunodeficiency virus positive. Practice characteristics were sampled, as were experiences with antiviral agents in pregnant women. RESULTS: Physician attitudes were influenced by their type of medical practice environment. Bioethical considerations were further influenced by data reflecting zidovudine use in pregnant women. Two thirds of respondents favored mandatory human immunodeficiency virus testing of all pregnant patients. More than 90% favored public health reporting of all human immunodeficiency virus - positive patients. One quarter of respondents were not current on California human immunodeficiency virus codes. A persistent percentage do not offer human immunodeficiency virus counseling or testing. CONCLUSION: Considerable physician support exists for mandating human immunodeficiency virus testing in all pregnant patients as the primary means of decreasing maternal-fetal human immunodeficiency virus transmission and the considerable resulting costs. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1750-6.)
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
