Abstract
On 26 December 2006, two closely linked earthquakes, both ML 7.0, occurred only 8 minutes apart at 12:26:21 and 12:34:15 UT, respectively, in southwestern offshore of Taiwan near Pingtung. These two earthquakes were referred to as the Pingtung Earthquake Doublet that is unique not only because of being an earthquake doublet, but also both events were the largest in southwestern Taiwan during the past one hundred years. The occurrence of this doublet was in a region, where the seismic activity has been relatively low. According to the Central Weather Bureau (CWB) catalog, the epicenter of the first event is located at 21.69 N and 120.56 E with a focal depth 44 km and a magnitude of ML = 7.0 (Mw = 7.0 Global CMT), the second earthquake was at 21.97 N and 120.42 E, about 36 km to the northnortheast of the first event, with a magnitude of ML = 7.0 (Mw = 6.9 Global CMT) and a focal depth of 50 km. This earthquake doublet caused 44 injuries, including 2 fatal ones, 3 building collapses, and a massive failure of submarine communication cables, resulting in a significant economic loss. In addition, the Taipower’s Nuclear Power Plant No. 3 (NPP3), which is within about 50 km from the epicenters of the earthquake doublet, registered the largest motions ever since the strong-motion recording commenced at the plant site. As a result, the Unit 2 of NPP3 was shut down while Unit 1 remained operatal at the time of the doublet event. The occurrence of this earthquake doublet has caused a debate on the possible association to an active fault, and its linkage to the subducting slab of Manila trench. The focal mechanisms determined from Broadband Array in Taiwan for Seismology (BATS) were a normal faulting for the first, and a strike-slip faulting for the second event. The associated rupture planes of the earthquake doublet were difficult to determine due to the sparse distribution of the aftershocks for the first one. The aftershock distribution from the CWB near the hypocentral area of the second one suggests a west-dipping northwest-southeast striking ruptured plane. Tectonically, this earthquake doublet gives the insight toward understanding of the seismic activity in southwestern Taiwan, and thus, brings special attention to the potential hazard from large earthquakes in southern Taiwan. In view of the characteristics of the earthquake doublet, in this Special Issue, we have compiled valuable data observed from this earthquake doublet and studies investigating earthquake occurrence and rupture characteristics of this earthquake doublet. We believe that this Special Issue should be a useful documentation to the Pintung earthquake doublet, and will be beneficial to the hazard mitigation of the future large earthquakes associated with the southwestern Taiwan tectonics. This Pingtung Earthquake Doublet Special Issue consists of 16 regular articles and 2 notes. It began with three articles on the discussion of the initial rupture of the earthquake by Haung et al. (2008a), the fault rupture plane determination and spatial slip distribution analysis from the regional strong motion and BATS waveform data by Lee et al. (2008) and Yen et al. (2008) to obtain the geometry of fault ruptures and to discuss the interaction of the earthquake doublet from the spatial slip distributions based on teleseismic data. Chen et al. (2008d) used the teleseismic data to refine the source depths of this earthquake doublet. Furthermore, Lin et al. (2008) studied the possible static triggering of earthquake doubles in convergent zones of Taiwan. The valuable strong motion data from the CWB’s Taiwan Strong-Motion Instrumentation Program (TSMIP) stations for this earthquake doublet was compiled by four articles. The most comprehensive one is by Wu et al. (2008a), giving the data processing procedures for the efficient use of the data for other researchers, and a comparison of ground motions recorded by multiple accelerographs at a common site in Taipei, and attenuation of the horizontal ground motions. Wen et al. (2008) compiled the damage features and strong motion records, especially near the Taipower’s Nuclear Power Plant No. 3, to give the seismic hazard assessment for southwestern Taiwan. Chen et al. (2008b) gave special attention to the long-period ground motion observations along paths of the earthquake doublet traversing the Central Range, and the Longitudinal Valley, respectively. Lee and Tsai (2008), furthermore, provided the near site structure for mapping average shear-wave velocity of the upper 30 meters of soil profile (Vs30) in Taiwan. In addition to seismic data, GPS observations and analysis associated with this earthquake doublet were also carried out by Chen et al. (2008a). For offshore large earthquakes, several articles address their corresponding tsunami potential and the possible association of the earthquake doublet with the offshore tectonic structure. Chen et al. (2008c) evaluated the earthquake probabilities and energy characteristics in southwestern offshore Taiwan for the slow tsunami earthquake, and Wu et al.
Highlights
On 26 December 2006, two closely linked earthquakes, both ML 7.0, occurred only 8 minutes apart at 12:26:21 and 12:34:15 UT, respectively, in southwestern offshore of Taiwan near Pingtung
The associated rupture planes of the earthquake doublet were difficult to determine due to the sparse distribution of the aftershocks for the first one
In view of the characteristics of the earthquake doublet, in this Special Issue, we have compiled valuable data observed from this earthquake doublet and studies investigating earthquake occurrence and rupture characteristics of this earthquake doublet
Summary
On 26 December 2006, two closely linked earthquakes, both ML 7.0, occurred only 8 minutes apart at 12:26:21 and 12:34:15 UT, respectively, in southwestern offshore of Taiwan near Pingtung. The associated rupture planes of the earthquake doublet were difficult to determine due to the sparse distribution of the aftershocks for the first one.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.