Abstract

Recent studies have clearly demonstrated that preemptive renal transplantation is associated with better graft and patient survival. It improves the quality of life and is a cost-effective option compared to conventional transplantation. We report our experience with this concept and review the literature. We retrospectively analyzed all adult kidney transplantations performed in our center between March 1986 and May 2004: among 463 renal transplantations 44 were preemptive (9.5%). Mean follow-up was 45.7 ± 6 months in preemptive versus 62.3 ± 2.6 months in the other group. At the end of the study, graft survivals were 93.2% and 77.1%, respectively ( P = .02). Patient survival rates were similar in both groups. In the preemptive group, grafts were more likely to come from living donors ( P < .001) and cold ischemia time was shorter ( P = .02). A subgroup case-control study showed that cost saving for dialysis in the preemptive group was about 119,000 Euros per patient. More preemptive patients had professional activity before ( P = .0002) and after transplantation ( P = .02). Our results and data from the literature support the place of preemptive transplantation as the optimal mode of renal replacement therapy for medical and socioeconomic reasons.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call