Pre‐emergence herbicides, not carrier volume, impacted weed management in conventional tillage systems

Abstract

AbstractThe use of pre‐emergence (PRE) herbicides is resurging as a standard practice for weed management in corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in the U.S. north‐central region. The increased use of PRE herbicides warrants investigation on the impact of spray carrier volume on weed control. Field experiments were established at Arlington, WI, in 2018 and 2019 and Janesville, WI, in 2018 to evaluate the influence of carrier volume on weed control of PRE herbicides in conventional tilled corn and soybean. Each experiment included three PRE herbicide premixes applied at crop planting at five carrier volumes (2.5, 5, 10, 15, and 17.5 gal acre−1). A nontreated control was also included in the experiment. Carrier volume did not influence weed control but PRE herbicide selection did. In corn, acetochlor + clopyralid + mesotrione and bicyclopyrone + mesotrione + S‐metolachlor provided 10–13% better annual grass, common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.), and giant ragweed (A. trifida L.) control than fluthiacet‐methyl + pyroxasulfone. In soybean, dimethenamid‐P + saflufenacil resulted in similar common ragweed control as the flumioxazin + pyroxasulfone treatment (79–85%), and 6 and 14% higher annual grass control and biomass reduction, respectively, compared to metribuzin + chlorimuron‐ethyl at Arlington. At Janesville, due to the high giant ragweed density in soybean, all herbicide treatments provided low levels of giant ragweed control (48–56%). Results from these field experiments suggest that lower carrier volumes could be used for PRE herbicide applications without compromising weed control in conventional tillage systems.