Predominant polarity as a neurobiological specifier in bipolar disorder: Evidence from a multimodal neuroimaging study

Abstract

BackgroundWhile predominant (PP) and onset polarity (OP) have considerable clinical and treatment implications in bipolar disorder (BD), the neurobiological underpinnings of PP and OP from a radiological perspective remain largely unknown. The main objective of this study is to investigate the neuroanatomical profile of polarity subphenotypes (PP and OP) in euthymic BD patients, using a standardized multimodal neuroimaging protocol to evaluate regional gray matter (GM) volumes, cortical thickness, as well as white matter (WM) integrity of major projection, commissural and association tracts. MethodsForty-two euthymic BD patients stratified for PP and OP and 42 healthy controls (HC) were included in this computational neuroimaging study to comprehensively characterize gray and white matter alterations. Univariate analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs) were conducted with Bonferroni corrections for each MRI modality and Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated for group comparisons. ResultsPhenotype-associated cortical thickness abnormalities and volumetric alterations were identified, but no WM changes ascertained. Specifically, we found a main effect of OP on GM volume of left middle frontal gyrus and of OP and PP (either or both) on cortical thickness of various regions previously implicated in BD, i.e. inferior frontal gyrus-pars opercularis (left) and pars orbitalis (bilateral), left lateral orbitofrontal gyrus, bilateral medial segment of the superior frontal gyrus, left planum polare, right anterior cingulate gyrus, left anterior and posterior insula, bilateral frontal operculum (both OP and PP); left anterior and posterior orbitofrontal gyrus, left transverse temporal gyrus, right posterior insula (only OP); and right medial frontal cortex (only PP). Based on the magnitude of differences on pairwise comparisons, we found a large effect of OP on cortical thickness in a single region (left anterior orbitofrontal gyrus) (OP-M > OP-D), while PP subgroups showed large or medium effect size differences in cortical thickness (PP-M > PP-D) in a wider array of regions (right medial frontal cortex, left frontal operculum, left inferior frontal gyrus-pars opercularis, bilateral medial segment of the superior frontal gyrus). For most regions, PP-D patients showed the greatest decreases in cortical thickness compared to HC while PP-M showed the smallest, with PP-U showing an “unspecified” pattern mostly lying in-between PP-D and PP-M. ConclusionsOur multimodal imaging findings suggest specific polarity BD subgroups with compromised cortical thickness; we recorded a greater impact of PP on brain structure compared to OP, which provides additional evidence that PP can be considered as a neurobiological specifier in BD.