Predominant integrin ligands expressed by osteoblasts show preferential regulation in response to both cell adhesion and mechanical perturbation

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that both mechanical perturbation and cell adhesion induced the expression of osteopontin (opn) by osteoblasts (Carvalho et al. [1998] J. Cell. Biochem. 70:376-390). The present study examined if these same stimuli on osteoblasts would induce the expression of other integrin binding proteins, specifically fibronectin (fn) and bone sialoprotein (bsp). All three genes showed three- to four-fold maximal induction in response to both cell adhesion and a single 2-h period of an applied spatially uniform, dynamic biaxial strain of 1.3% at 0.25 Hz. Each gene, however, responded with a different time course of induction to mechanical strain, with bsp, fn, and opn showing their maximal response at 1, 3, and 9 h, respectively, after the perturbation period. In contrast, peak induction to cell adhesion was observed at 24 h for bsp and opn, while fn levels peaked at 8 h. Interestingly, while both opn and fn mRNA expression returned to base line after cell adhesion, bsp mRNA levels remained elevated. Examination of collagen type I and osteocalcin mRNAs showed unaltered levels of expression in response to either type of perturbation. A common feature of the signal transduction pathways, which mediate the gene expression in response to both cell adhesion and mechanical perturbation, was the activation of specific tyrosine kinases based on the ablation of the induction of these genes by the tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein. While cycloheximide blocked the induction of all three mRNAs in response cell adhesion, it failed to block the induction of any of these genes in response to mechanical perturbation. Such results suggest that the induction of these genes after mechanical perturbation was mediated by an immediate response to signal transduction, while cell adhesion mediated effects secondary to signal transduction. Depolymerization of microfilaments with cytochalasin D had no effect on the overall expression of any of these genes in response to cell adhesion and only blocked the induction of opn expression in response to mechanical perturbation. These results suggest that cytoskeletal integrity is only selectively important in the signal transduction of certain types of stimuli and for the regulation of certain genes. In summary, both mechanical perturbation and cell adhesion stimulated the expression of integrin binding proteins. Furthermore, while there are common features in the signal transduction processes that mediate the induction of these genes in response to both stimuli, specific genes are separately regulated by precise mechanisms that are unique to both forms of stimuli.