Predisposing and precipitating factors of post-operative delirium after transfemoral TAVI

Abstract

Abstract Background Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) represents the treatment of choice for aortic stenosis (AS) patients at higher age (> 75y) or with relevant comorbidities. Post-operative delirium (POD) is a frequent complication which has been associated with worse outcome. Thus, preventive options are highly needed. The aim of our single-center study was to investigate predisposing and precipitating factors of POD after transfemoral TAVI, with a focus on the influence of anaesthesia. Methods Risk factors for POD after TAVI were analysed in 2 merged cohorts of 480 study patients (43% women; mean age 80 years), enrolled in 2017-2022 (n=375, TAVI in 95% in general anaesthesia) and in 2022-2024 (n=105, TAVI in 91% in local anaesthesia). Incidence of POD was evaluated retrospectively by nursing documentation, medical records, and DRG coding. The association of demographics, comorbidities, echo parameters, procedural parameters, anaesthesia, and peri-procedural complications with POD incidence was investigated. Results In total, 29 patients (6%) developed POD, with a tendency towards a lower incidence in the later cohort (6.7% vs. 3.8%; p=0.28). Regarding baseline characteristics, patients experiencing POD were more likely to be male (p=0.03), frail (Katz Index <6, p=0.049), and to suffer from low-gradient AS (p=0.005 for paradoxical, p=0.02 for classical low-flow, low-gradient AS; see also fig. 1A). Total procedure time was significantly longer in patients with POD (median, 86 vs. 62 min, p=0.004; fig 1B), and a tendency towards a more frequent implantation of other than ballon-expandable valves could be observed (p=0.07). Concerning the role of anaesthesia, POD did not differ significantly after general anaesthesia (n=24/360, 6.7%), conscious sedation (n=1/19, 5.3%), and local anaesthesia (n=4/100, 4%) (p=0.38). Regarding procedural complications, POD patients were characterized by lower minimum hemoglobin post-TAVI (9.3 vs. 10.1 g/dl, p=0.05; fig. 1C) and higher incidences of intra-procedural resuscitation (11% vs. 2%, p=0.03), cerebrovascular accidents (10% vs. 2%, p=0.04) and new permanent pacemaker implantations (25% vs. 10%, p=0.02). In POD patients, long-term survival after TAVI was significantly reduced, with a median survival of only 2 years (Kaplan-Meier curves in fig. 2; p=0.001). Conclusions POD after TAVI stays common and unfavourable. The role of anaesthesia seems less pronounced than expected. Total procedure time and relevant anaemia after TAVI emerged as most important modifiable risk factors. Future research is warranted, since strategies to reduce precipitating factors for POD may have a significant impact on post-TAVI outcomes.Selected risk factors for PODConsequence of POD: Reduced Survival