Predictors of Surgical Versus Medical Management of Eyes in the Setting of Orbital Fracture at an Academic Level I Trauma Center.

Abstract

We present clinical and imaging predictors of ocular injuries that required medical management versus surgical intervention in cases of orbital fractures. From 2014 to 2020, a retrospective review of patients with orbital fractures who received ophthalmologic consultation and computed scan (CT) analysis at a level I trauma center was performed. Inclusion criteria were patients with confirmed orbital fracture on CT and ophthalmology consultation. Patient demographics, associated injuries, comorbidities, management, and outcomes were collected. Two hundred and one patients and 224 eyes (11.4% bilateral orbital fractures) were included. Overall, 21.9% of orbital fractures presented with a significant concomitant ocular injury. Associated facial fractures were present in 68.8% of eyes. Management included surgical treatment in 33.5% of eyes and ophthalmology-directed medical treatment in 17.4%. On multivariate analysis, clinical predictors of surgical intervention were retinal hemorrhage (OR=4.7 (1.0-21.0), P =0.0437), motor vehicle accident injury (OR=2.7 (1.4-5.1), P =0.0030) and diplopia (OR=2.8 (1.5-5.3), P =0.0011). Imaging predictors of surgical intervention were herniation of orbital contents (OR=2.1 (1.1-4.0), P =0.0281) and multiple wall fractures (OR=1.9 (1.01-3.6), P =0.0450). Predictors of medical management were corneal abrasion (OR=7.7 (1.9-31.4), P =0.0041), periorbital laceration (OR=5.7 (2.1-15.6), P =0.0006), and traumatic iritis (OR=4.7 (1.1-20.3), P =0.0444). We demonstrated a 22% incidence of concomitant ocular trauma in orbital fracture patients at our level I trauma center. Predictors of the surgical intervention included multiple wall fractures, herniation of orbital contents, retinal hemorrhage, diplopia, and motor vehicle accident injury. These findings emphasize the importance of a multidisciplinary team in managing ocular and facial trauma.