Abstract

BackgroundLocally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) requires a multimodal therapy tailored to the patient and tumor characteristics. Pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is necessary to stage the primary tumor, while restaging MRI, which is not systematically performed, may be of interest to identify poor responders to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NCRT), and redefine therapeutic approach. The EuMaRCS study group aimed to investigate the role and accuracy of pretreatment (including pelvimetry) and restaging MRIs in predicting surgical difficulties and surgical outcomes in LARC therapy.MethodsPatients with mid or low LARC who were administered NCRT, who underwent laparoscopic total mesorectal excision, and for whom pretreatment and restaging MRIs were available, were included.ResultsMRIs of 170 patients (median age: 61 years) were reanalyzed by the same radiologist. Pelvimetry differed significantly between males and females, but no gender difference was noted in the clinical and tumor characteristics. Tumor volume and tumor height assessed on the restaging MRI were associated, respectively, with operative time and estimated blood loss. Conversion was predicted by tumor volume, interischial distance and pubic tubercle height. The quality of the surgical resection was found to be a predictor of overall and disease-free survival. The sensitivity and specificity of tumor regression grade 1 to identify a pathologic complete response were 76.9% and 89.3%, respectively.ConclusionsIn LARC management, pelvimetry and restaging MRI may be useful to predict surgical difficulties and surgical outcomes. However, the main independent predictor of patient survival appears to be the achievement of a successful surgical resection.

Highlights

  • Advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is associated with poor prognosis and a high risk of developing local and distant metastases [1]

  • By analyzing pretreatment and restaging magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics together with the clinical and histopathological outcomes, the present results suggest that pelvimetry and restaging MRI are of interest to predict surgical difficulties and surgical outcomes as well as to identify pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NCRT), which is necessary to tailor treatment strategies in Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients

  • The multivariate analyses support that the main independent predictor of overall survival (OS) and diseasefree survival (DFS) in patients with mid- and low rectal cancer is the achievement of complete mesorectal excision with clear resection margins

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is associated with poor prognosis and a high risk of developing local and distant metastases [1]. After LARC diagnosis, neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NCRT) is used to decrease the risk of local recurrence and obtain downstaging of the primary tumor before surgery [3]. Indications for NCRT in case of LARC should be based on the MRI study performed to stage the primary tumor and assess its resectability (i.e., pretreatment MRI). Advanced rectal cancer (LARC) requires a multimodal therapy tailored to the patient and tumor characteristics. Pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is necessary to stage the primary tumor, while restaging MRI, which is not systematically performed, may be of interest to identify poor responders to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NCRT), and redefine therapeutic approach. The EuMaRCS study group aimed to investigate the role and accuracy of pretreatment (including pelvimetry) and restaging MRIs in predicting surgical difficulties and surgical outcomes in LARC therapy

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.