Abstract
BackgoundPierre Robin sequence (PRS) has worse speech outcomes than isolated cleft palate. We aimed to search for possible associations of phonological outcomes with PRS status (isolated vs syndromic), clinical severity, soft palate muscles deficiency, or surgical procedure. MethodsWe designed a retrospective study of 130 children (male/female ratio: 0.4) with isolated (96) or syndromic (34) PRS with cleft palate. Grading systems were used to classify retrognathia, glossoptosis, and respiratory and feeding disorders. Electromyography was used to investigate levator veli palatini muscles. Hard cleft palate was measured using maxillary casts. Intravelar veloplasty was performed using the Sommerlad's technique. Phonological outcomes were assessed using the Borel-Maisonny classification. ResultsCleft palate was repaired in one stage (65.5%) or hard palate closure was postponed (34.5%). Velopharyngeal insufficiency was more frequent in syndromic PRS (53%) vs. isolated PRS (30.5%) (p = 0.01), but was not statistically associated with clinical grade, hard cleft palate width, soft palate electromyography, and surgical procedure. ConclusionsIn children with PRS, anatomic variables, initial clinical severity, and soft palate muscle deficiency are not predictors of speech prognosis.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
