Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to explore the relevance of 4 proposed predictors of self-efficacy (Jerusalem & Schwarzer, 1986; Leganger, Kraft, & Røysamb, 2000) in a Norwegian Infantry Battalion preparing for a peacekeeping mission in Kosovo (N = 482). A hierarchical regression model was computed, and the 4 proposed predictor variables were entered in the following ranked order: (a) personal experience, (b) military skills and abilities, (c) risk perception, and (d) coping style. The individual’s evaluation of military skills and abilities proved to be the dominant predictor of self-efficacy (R2 = 36%). In addition, experience from previous missions in international operations (R2 = 3%) and task-focused coping style (R2 = 5%) came out as significant predictors. The fact that personal experience from previous military missions abroad, life-threatening incidents, and military service in general had little or no predictive power could question the general assumption of a linear relationship between personal experience and readiness. In a military unit, facing the unpredictability of military peacekeeping and peace-enforcing operations, beliefs in military skills and abilities seem to be the dominant factor when evaluating self-efficacy. These findings suggest the importance of realism in training and preparations aimed at specific scenarios and situations expected in the mission area to ensure realistic coping expectations.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.