Abstract

Abstract Background PMI is one of the most common and relevant complications that occur after PCI, but it is still a matter of controversy. This clinical entity has been frequently correlated to peculiar plaque morphological features by several intravascular imaging studies. PCI of the LM coronary artery is a complex procedural setting, where the prognostic value of PMI is higher. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has a traditional predominance in the guidance of LM-PCI, but optical coherence tomography (OCT) outperforms IVUS in spatial resolution and has affirmed itself as a strong support to PCI. Purpose The aim of this study is to identify preprocedural and postprocedural optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings potentially related to periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-ostial left main (LM) bifurcation disease. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 76 patients who underwent OCT before and after LM-PCI. Definitions of OCT findings were derived from expert consensus documents and major OCT studies. PMI was defined in accordance with the Academic Research Consortium-2 (ARC-2) definition. Results The presence of TCFA was found to be an independent predictor of PMI, and coherently a significantly higher lipid core arc was observed in the PMI group. Mean stent area was the only post-PCI feature to result significantly higher in the PMI group. Conclusions We found the presence of TCFA at pre-PCI OCT was an independent predictor of PMI. A higher mean stent area at post-PCI OCT in patients who developed PMI may suggest that aggressive stent expansion could not always be the right choice in such a context.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.