Predictors of percutaneous access-related complications in aortic endovascular procedures: 'real-world' insights and a comparison to open access.

Abstract

Percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair (PEVAR) is becoming increasingly popular due to fewer access-related complications, shorter procedural times and length of stay (LOS). Our aim was to explore factors associated with access-related complications and their impact on procedural time and LOS. We retrospectively analyzed consecutive aorto-iliac endovascular procedures in a tertiary hub comprising 2 institutions and 18 consultant vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists between 2016-2017. Access-related complications were defined as: bleeding requiring cutdown or return to theatre, acute limb ischemia or common femoral artery (CFA) pseudoaneurysm requiring intervention and wound infection or dehiscence needing hospitalization. Of 511 patients, 354 (69%) had a percutaneous approach via 589 CFA access sites. In this percutaneous group, access-related complications occurred in 11% of sites (65/589); Their rate varied with procedure type ranging between 3.6% to 17.6%. The most common complication was bleeding due to closure device failure in 8.5% (50/589) of access sites. When uncomplicated, percutaneous interventions were faster compared to open surgical access (P<0.0001). Operation time and median LOS (3 vs. 2 days) were longer for elective standard EVAR patients experiencing access-related complications (P=0.033). In the percutaneous group, multivariate regression analysis demonstrated significant associations between access-related complications and eGFR (odds ratio (OR) 0.984 [0.972-0.997], P=0.014), CFA depth (OR 1.026 [1.008-1.045], P=0.005), device used (Prostar vs. Proglide (OR 2.177 [1.236-3.832], P=0.007) and procedural type (complex vs. standard EVAR) (OR 2.017 [1.122-3.627], P=0.019). We developed a risk score which had reasonably good predictive power (C-statistic 0.716 [0.646-0.787], P<0.0001) for avoiding access complications. Physiological (low eGFR level), anatomical (increased CFA depth) and technical factors (choice of device and complex procedures) were identified as predictors of access-related complications in this large retrospective series. These are important for safe selection of patients that would benefit from percutaneous access.