Predictors of long-term survivorship after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer patients

Abstract

Objectives: Although non-inferior overall survival and reduced surgical morbidity with neoadjuvant therapy (NAC) compared to primary debulking surgery, upfront debulking surgery remains the treatment of choice for newly diagnosed advanced stage ovarian cancer (OC) in the US. This can be partially attributed to the association of aggressive surgical treatment with long term survival (LTS) demonstrated in high grade serous OC (HGSOC). On the contrary, NAC has been shown to lower the odds for LTS. We aimed to identify clinico-pathologic factors associated with LTS in advanced epithelial OC (EOC) treated with NAC. Methods: This is a retrospective case-control study. Women with FIGO stage III-IV high grade epithelial cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube or peritoneum diagnosed and treated with NAC prior to 2013 were extracted from consecutive patient records of the Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center. Women surviving longer than 7 years from diagnosis (defined as long-term survivors, LTS) were compared to women surviving 6-24 months from diagnosis (defined as short-term survivors, STS). Patients with low grade or low malignant potential tumors were excluded. Results: We identified 190 women with stage III/IV epithelial OC. Seventy-eight patients (41%) survived longer than 5 years from diagnosis and 47 (24%) survived longer than 7 years from diagnosis, significantly higher proportions compared to previous reports. Thirty-nine patients (20%) survived 6-24 months, similar to previous reports. Clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics of both groups are displayed in Table 1. CA125 pre-treatment or after 4 courses of chemotherapy and the number of adjuvant and total chemotherapy courses administered were similar between the groups. LTS were significantly younger than STS at diagnosis, with a mean age of 60.05 years vs 65.95 years, respectively (p=0.008). The majority of LTS received 3 courses of NAC or less compared to STS (59.6% vs 33.4%), implying a smaller disease burden or better response to NAC. LTS had a significantly longer disease-free interval (80.49 months vs 3.65 months, p Download : Download high-res image (404KB) Download : Download full-size image Conclusions: Our analysis, to the best of our knowledge, is the first to demonstrate that NAC does not compromise the odds of long-term survivorship in women with advanced EOC, further strengthening NAC as an equivalent alternative to primary debulking surgery. In addition, we identified basic clinicpathologic and treatment-related factors associated with long term survival of epithelial OC patients treated with NAC. Further investigation is needed to determine which factors should be integrated into treatment-related decisions.