Abstract

Abstract Background: Sparse data is available comparing the outcome of Community-acquired acute kidney Injury (CA-AKI) and Hospital-acquired acute kidney injury (HA-AKI). Aims: This study was undertaken to compare the demographic, clinical spectrum and in-hospital outcomes of CA-AKI versus HA-AKI. Patients and Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted from October 2020 to December 2021 in the inpatient departments (IPDs) of a tertiary-care referral centre in north India. A total of 65 patients with CA-AKI and 32 patients with HA-AKI were enrolled. The characteristics and outcomes of AKI in both groups were compared. Results: The mean age of patients in the CA-AKI and HA-AKI groups was 46.7 years and 45.5 years respectively. The CA-AKI group had significantly higher baseline serum creatinine, serum creatinine at admission, proportion of patients requiring renal replacement therapy, proportion of patients having oligo-anuria and hyperkalemia at presentation. Despite more patients in the CA-AKI group being in AKI-Stage 3 at presentation, in-hospital mortality was observed to be lower in this group. However, on comparing the overall survival, both groups were found to be comparable. The independent predictors of mortality were the presence of lung disease and the requirement of vasopressor support at presentation. Conclusion: It was observed that both recovery and dialysis dependency were more common in patients with CA-AKI. Both groups had comparable overall survival. Only two factors, i.e. the presence of lung disease and the requirement of vasopressor support at presentation predicted the survival of AKI patients. The type of AKI was not an independent predictor of mortality in such patients.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.