Predictors of and longitudinal assessment of health utility scores in patients with small cell lung cancer using real-world data.

Abstract

e19306 Background: Recent advances in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) treatments necessitate a better understanding of health utility scores (HUS) of patients treated under standard regimens to facilitate robust pharmaco-economic assessments. HUS collected in clinical trials may be inherently skewed due to restrictive eligibility criteria, highlighting the need for real-world data. Methods: In this cohort observational study, HUS were evaluated in SCLC patients through EQ-5D surveys. We also evaluated patient reported (pr) ECOG performance status (PS)), treatment toxicities (modified patient reported (mpr) CTCAE) and symptoms (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, ESAS). Clinical data were abstracted from electronic medical records. The impact of these variables on HUS was explored using regression. Results: Of 282 clinical encounters (12% newly diagnosed; 37% stable on treatment; 22% progressing; 29% stable off therapy/other) in 111 SCLC patients (58% male; 64% extensive stage), 29% had pr-ECOG PS ≥ 2 at the first encounter. Mean HUS in treatment naïve patients with limited disease was 0.848 (SEM = 0.028); for extensive stage, mean HUS = 0.715 (SEM = 0.046). Extensive stage (β = -0.12; p = 0.03), bone metastases (β = -0.10; p = 0.04), females (β = -0.07; p = 0.006), and pr-ECOG PS ≥ 2 (β = -0.21; p < 0.001) were each associated with decreased HUS in multivariable analyses. When excluding pr-ECOG PS from the model (highly correlated with HUS), progressive disease (β = -0.07; p = 0.02) was also associated with decreased HUS. Longitudinally, in patients with disease stability, HUS were unchanged in limited disease, but slowly decreased for extensive stage over time. HUS were inversely associated with increasing severity of most measured toxicities (mpr-CTCAE rho values ranged from -0.34 to -0.47) and symptoms (rho values -0.27 to -0.54). Conclusions: HUS in SCLC is impacted by the presence of extensive stage and bone metastases, in addition to cancer symptoms and treatment toxicities. The values reported from this real-world sample provides a basis in which to compare with new SCLC therapies in health technology assessments. [Table: see text]