Abstract

Carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms are indication for endovascular treatment. Coil embolization is associated with a high recanalization rate and thus usage of flow diverter (FD) could constitute the treatment of choice. Although implementation of FD is very effective, it carries a significant risk of complications. The goal of our study was to find a radiological recanalization marker in order to facilitate decision process which would result in fewer treatment-related complications and in this way, to personalize endovascular therapy.We made a retrospective analysis of seventy-five patients with saccular carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms treated endovascularly. Morphometric measurements were performed in CTA 3D aneurysm models. The aneurysm size and volume were measured on the base of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images. The treatment effectiveness was determined visually using the modified Raymond Roy classification after embolization and on the 6- and 12-month follow-up DSA. Statistica 13.1 software was used. Multivariate analyses showed that the aneurysm neck size (OR 2.51; 95%CI: 1.20–5.26), aspect ratio (OR 2.60; 95%CI: 1.27–5.21) and neck to parent artery ratio (OR 2.68; 95%CI: 1.26–5.70) were risk factors for carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms recanalization after 6 months. Of those factors, aneurysm neck size remained the only significant risk factor for carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms recanalization after 12 months (OR 5.23, 95%CI: 1.71–15.93).Various factors seem to influence recanalization. Preoperatively, if the above-mentioned predictors of recanalization are present, coiling is burdened with a high recanalization rate. In those cases, FD embolization should be considered.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.