Abstract

634 Background: Utilization of ctDNA has been rapidly adopted as a predictive diagnostic in advanced NSCLC and indications in GI cancers may be emerging. While tissue-based assays have yields above 90%, there is less known about factors that influence the sensitivity of ctDNA for detecting mutations. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated mCRC patients (pts) who had plasma-derived NGS utilizing a highly-sensitive 68-73-gene assay. Tissue from prior resections or biopsies underwent concurrent 46-gene sequencing. In a case-control design, pts with a known mutation on tissue and radiologic evidence of metastatic disease but no detectable ctDNA mutation were matched 1:3 with randomly selected pts with detectable mutations and compared according to clinical, laboratory, and radiologic characteristics. A binary logistic regression was performed and Kaplan-Meier and Cox-proportional hazards models were used to compare overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survivals. Results: Of 427 mCRC pts who underwent ctDNA testing, 416 pts met inclusion criteria. Plasma-derived NGS did not find tumor mutations in 66 cases (15.9%); 198 pts with detectable alterations were selected as controls. After multivariate analysis, the lack of detection of ctDNA was associated with decreasing age (OR 0.94; 95%CI 0.91-0.98; p = 0.004), absence of liver (OR 0.19; 95%CI 0.08-0.45; p < 0.001) and lymph node metastases (OR 0.28; 95%CI 0.12-0.70; p = 0.006). A key determinant was timing of collection relative to disease status: plasma collected after evidence of progression was substantially more likely to have detectable alterations (OR 10.95; 95%CI 4.23-28.33; p < .001); in these pts, the modeled rate of detection was 98%, which increased to > 99% if the pts also had either liver or nodal disease. Pts with no detectable ctDNA had better OS (HR 0.38; 95%CI 0.21-0.69, p = 0.002) and PFS (HR 0.52; 95%CI 0.32-0.85; p = 0.009). Conclusions: When limited to ctDNA collected in newly diagnosed or recently progressing pts, the yield of ctDNA is 98%, which equals or exceeds the yield of tissue based testing. Our findings support the notion that ctDNA testing, when appropriately utilized, can replace tissue based testing and may provide prognostic information.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.