Abstract

PurposeAutosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common hereditary kidney disease, and 20% of patients eventually require nephrectomies due to compressive symptoms or renal-related complications. Traditionally, nephrectomies were performed via the open approach in view of space constraints. We evaluate our institution's outcomes for laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN) for ADPKD.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 33 patients with ADPKD who underwent nephrectomies from November 2005 to December 2016 at a tertiary institution. Preoperative kidney volume was calculated via the ellipsoid method by using computed tomography scan.ResultsThe median age was 51.0 years (interquartile range [IQR], 44.5–56.0 years). Sixteen patients (48.5%) underwent open nephrectomy (ON), 15 patients (45.5%) had LNs, and 2 patients (6.1%) had laparoscopic converted to ON due to dense adhesions. Thirteen patients had bilateral while 18 patients had unilateral nephrectomies. Median kidney volume in the open group was 1,042 cm3 (IQR, 753–2,365 cm3) versus 899 cm3 (IQR, 482–1,914 cm3) in the laparoscopy group and did not differ significantly. The operative time was comparable between both groups. Patients who underwent LN had lesser blood loss (350 mL vs. 650 mL; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.822–3.533; p=0.016) and shorter length of hospital stay (4.0 days vs. 6.5 days; 95% CI, 1.445–5.755; p=0.001) compared to patients who underwent ON. Both groups had similar low morbidity rate and no mortality.ConclusionsLN for ADPKD is a safe and effective alternative to ON independent of kidney size with comparable outcomes and benefits of minimally invasive surgery.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.