Predictive values and specificity of electroencephalographic findings in autoimmune encephalitis diagnosis

Abstract

ObjectiveEarly diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis (AE) to not delay treatment is challenging but needed in practice. Most previous evidences of electroencephalographic (EEG) findings in AE were derived from descriptive studies. Given paucity of evidence of specific EEG findings to help with early diagnosis of AE, this study aimed to ascertain specific EEG findings and assess their predictive values in diagnosis of AE. MethodsWe included all cases with AE in our institution from January 2013 to June 2017. Cases were matched with controls by age and level of consciousness (1:2 ratio). Potential confounders for EEG findings collected as baseline characteristics were compared. Two epileptologists independently reviewed EEGs. Standardized terminology, definitions, and scoring system of EEG findings were employed. Logistic regression analysis was performed, and diagnostic performance of significant EEG features was assessed. ResultsTwenty cases and 40 controls were included in this study. Poorly sustained posterior dominant rhythm (PDR) was significantly associated with AE (p = 0.007) and even more predictive in anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) encephalitis. Inter-rater agreement (kappa) was 0.714. None of the cases had normal EEG nor Grand Total EEG (GTE) score < 4 (negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%). Specificity of well sustained PDR to exclude the diagnosis of anti-NMDA encephalitis was high (91.67%). ConclusionsSimple EEG assessment can be used to help exclude AE. When AE is suspected, careful assessment of the sustainment of the PDR is warranted. The NPV of GTE score < 4 and specificity of well sustained PDR can be simply used to differentiate many conditions from AE.