Predictive value of suicidal risk assessment using data from China's largest suicide prevention hotline

Abstract

BackgroundSuicide hotlines are widely used, with potential for identification of callers at especially high risk. MethodsThis prospective study was conducted at the largest psychological support hotline in China. From 2015 to 2017, all distressed callers were consecutively included and assessed, using a standardized scale consisting of 12 elements, yielding scores of high risk (8–16), moderate risk (4–7), and low risk (0–3) for suicidal act. All high-risk and half of moderate- and low-risk callers were scheduled for a 12-month follow-up. Main outcomes were suicidal acts (nonlethal attempt, death) over follow-up. ResultsOf 21,346 fully assessed callers, 5822, 11,791, and 3733 were classified as high-, moderate-, or low-risk for suicidal acts, with 8869 callers (4076 high-, 3258 moderate-, and 1535 low-risk) followed up over 12 months. Over follow-up, 802 (9.0 %) callers attempted suicide or died by suicide. The high-risk callers (15.1 %) had 3-fold higher risk for subsequent suicidal acts than moderate- (5.1 %) and 12-fold higher risk than low-risk callers (1.3 %). The weighted sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of high risk scores were 56.4 %, 74.9 %, and 14.4 %. LimitationsAssessed callers with different risk levels were followed disproportionally. ConclusionsSuicidal risk assessment during a hotline call is both feasible and predictive of risk, guiding resource allocation to higher risk callers.