Abstract
BackgroundSpirometry is essential to identify cases with obstructive lung diseases (OLDs) in primary care. However, knowledge about the long-term prognostic outcome among younger individuals is sparse.AimTo describe the predictive value of spirometry among individuals in the age groups 30–49 years and 45–64 years.Design & settingA population-based cohort study supplied with data from Danish national registries.MethodSpirometry was performed in 905 adults aged 30–49 years in 1991 and in 1277 adults aged 45–64 years in 2006. The participants were categorised into three groups: forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) <70, 70–75, and >75. They were followed throughout 2017 using Danish national registries. Lung disease was defined as fulfilling at least one of the following: two prescriptions for respiratory medicine were redeemed within a year; one lung-related contact to the hospital; or lung-related death.ResultsIn the 1991 cohort, 21% developed lung diseases and in the 2006 cohort 17% developed lung diseases throughout 2017. The probability of developing lung disease if FEV1/FVC 70–75 was 35% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 25% to 44%) in the 1991 cohort and 23% (95% CI = 17% to 28%) in the 2006 cohort. The positive predicted value (PPV) was higher for both cohorts when focusing on smoking history and self-reported respiratory symptoms.ConclusionThe initial spirometry has a high predictive value to identify cases of future lung diseases. In addition, the group with FEV1/FVC 70–75 had a high risk of developing lung diseases later in life, suggesting this group would be a meaningful target of special interest.
Highlights
The probability of developing lung disease if forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) 70–75 was 35% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 25% to 44%) in the 1991 cohort and 23% in the 2006 cohort
The group with FEV1/FVC 70–75 had a high risk of developing lung diseases later in life, suggesting this group would be a meaningful target of special interest
To the authors' knowledge, there are no published studies investigating the value of spirometry in adults to predict later development of lung disease
Summary
In a previous study[7] it was found that adults with FEV1/FVC 70–75 have a higher risk of receiving respiratory medicine, have more GP contacts, and a lower income compared with those with a normal spirometry, defined as FEV1/FVC >75. This poor prognosis emphasises the importance of exploring the value of identifying the group with a FEV1/FVC 70–75. Spirometry is essential to identify cases with obstructive lung diseases (OLDs) in primary care. Knowledge about the long-t erm prognostic outcome among younger individuals is sparse
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
