Abstract

BackgroundIn adults, a single pre-treatment four-dimensional CT (4D-CT) acquisition is often used to account for respiratory-induced target motion during radiotherapy. However, studies have indicated that a 4D-CT is not always representative for respiratory motion. Our aim was to investigate whether respiratory-induced diaphragm motion in children on a single pre-treatment 4DCT can accurately predict respiratory-induced diaphragm motion as observed on cone beam CTs (CBCTs).MethodsTwelve patients (mean age 14.5 yrs.; range 8.6–17.9 yrs) were retrospectively included based on visibility of the diaphragm on abdominal or thoracic imaging data acquired during free breathing. A 4DCT for planning purposes and daily/weekly CBCTs (total 125; range 4–29 per patient) acquired prior to dose delivery were available. The amplitude, corresponding to the difference in position of the diaphragm in cranial-caudal direction in end-inspiration and end-expiration phases, was extracted from the 4DCT (A4DCT). The amplitude in CBCTs (ACBCT) was defined as displacement between averaged in- and expiration diaphragm positions on corresponding projection images, and the distribution of ACBCT was compared to A4DCT (one-sample t-test, significance level p < 0.05).ResultsOver all patients, the mean A4DCT was 10.4 mm and the mean ACBCT 11.6 mm. For 9/12 patients, A4DCT differed significantly (p < 0.05) from ACBCT. Differences > 3 mm were found in 69/125 CBCTs (55%), with A4DCT mostly underestimating ACBCT. For 7/12 patients, diaphragm positions differed significantly from the baseline position.ConclusionRespiratory-induced diaphragm motion determined on 4DCT does not accurately predict the daily respiratory-induced diaphragm motion observed on CBCTs, as the amplitude and baseline position differed statistically significantly in the majority of patients. Regular monitoring of respiratory motion during the treatment course using CBCTs could yield a higher accuracy when a daily adaptation to the actual breathing amplitude takes place.

Highlights

  • In adults, a single pre-treatment four-dimensional Computed tomography (CT) (4D-CT) acquisition is often used to account for respiratory-induced target motion during radiotherapy

  • Underestimation of A4DCT compared to amplitude in CBCTs (ACBCT) was found in 76% of the measurements (95/ 125 cone beam CT (CBCT)), and was observed in 11 out of 12 patients

  • We plotted ACBCT over time of the treatment course (Additional file 1: Figure S1) where day 0 is the day of 4-Dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) acquisition

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A single pre-treatment four-dimensional CT (4D-CT) acquisition is often used to account for respiratory-induced target motion during radiotherapy. Our previous study showed that respiratory-induced diaphragm motion throughout the treatment course was more stable in children than previously reported by others in adults [14]. This implies that a single measurement could be more representative in children than in adults and suggests that a pre-treatment 4DCT in children could be at least beneficial as it is in adults [14]. Respiratory-induced organ motion was only measured within a single 4DCT per patient [15,16,17], without assessing how representative the 4DCT is for respiratory-induced motion during the treatment course. With increasing use of 4DCT in pediatric radiotherapy, assessment of the predictive value of the measurements on 4DCT is essential to take full advantage of this technique

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call