Abstract
Sera from 51 ovarian cancer patients in clinical remission undergoing a second-look operation were studied. CA 125, CA 15-3, and 90K assays were performed in the week preceding surgery. Twenty-seven patients (53%) had no evidence of disease; 3 (6%) and 21 (41%) had microscopic and macroscopic disease. All patients but two with no evidence of disease had normal CA 125 serum levels, as did the three cases with microscopic disease and 6 patients with macroscopically detectable tumor. Of 17 patients with high CA 125 values, 15 (88%) were found to have persistent disease. Hence, the sensitivity and specificity of a CA 125 assay were 62 and 93%, respectively. CA 15-3 levels were low in all patients with no evidence of disease, in 2 cases wih microscopic disease, and in 2 cases with residual tumor >1 cm. All patients with high CA 15-3 titers had a positive second-look. The sensitivity and specificity of assay were 69 and 100%, respectively. With the 90K assay, 4 false-positive and 4 false-negative results were found and the sensitivity and specificity were 69 and 67%, respectively. However, 3 of 4 cases with a falsepositive 90K assay had recurrence of disease with 7, 9, and 20 months later. Combination of the three markers increased sensitivity to 79%. These data suggest that more effective surveillance of disease status at second-look is obtained by using a combination of tumor marker assays.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
