Abstract

The ARIMA model is widely adopted by the financial industry as the standard statistical instrument for forecasting asset returns. Numerous studies have compared the accuracy of the ARIMA model with other competing models. However, there are no studies that cover a broad range of equities and their time series. Furthermore, there is no clear guideline on the time series window selected to fit the ARIMA model. In addition, there are no firm conclusions on whether older information in the sample should be abandoned. This makes it impossible to draw a definitive conclusion about the predictive power of the ARIMA model. This study sets out to address this gap in the literature. It summarizes more than two million ARIMA forecasts of future daily returns, using data from January 3, 1996 to May 12, 2017. The forecasts are run with different model parameter settings. We find that the five-year sliding fixed-width window fits US equity market asset prices to the highest degree, with an annual over-optimistic error of 2.6561%. However, when environments with positive and negative returns are separated, the ARIMA models generate forecasting errors of − 0.0009% and 0.011%, and both underestimate gain and loss. These errors are lower for low volatility equities. We conclude that the lack of nonlinearity of the ARIMA model is not a major concern, and that the ARIMA models do not lose their validity if the data windows are carefully selected. Our conclusions are not in conflict with the weak form market efficiency hypothesis and are robust in an environment with transaction cost.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.