Abstract

Background and Purpose Candida albicans is the major fungal species associated with superficial mucosal infections such as oral candidiasis as well as systemic mycoses with high morbidity and mortality. On top of the rising drug resistance, currently available antifungal agents have significant adverse effects. Nephrotoxicity is the major treatment complication associated with antifungal agents.Recently, we discovered a novel antifungal small molecule SM21 with promising antifungal activity. The present study aimed to comparatively evaluate the in vivo and in vitro nephrotoxicity of SM21 comparing with Amphotericin B and voriconazole.Experimental ApproachNephrotoxicity of SM21 and its analogue were comparatively evaluated with Amphotericin B (AmB) and voriconazole. Immortalized human kidney proximal tubule epithelial cells (HK-2) were used for in vitro analysis of nephrotoxicity using cytotoxicity assays and qPCR gene expression analysis (Kim-1/HAVcr-1, CASP3). Sprague Dawley (SD) rat model was used to evaluate the nephrotoxicity in vivo using classical (SCr and BUN) and next-generation kidney injury urinary biomarkers (Kim-1, CLU, ALB, NGAL, β2M, and Cys C) alongside histopathological and immunohistochemical standards.Key ResultsAmB treatment showed a stronger cytotoxic impact on HK-2 viability and gene expression of cell death markers (Kim-1/HAVcr-1, CASP3) compared with SM21 and SM21 analogue in vitro (P < 0.01). In vivo data further demonstrated that SM21 did not significantly increase classical as well as novel nephrotoxic biomarkers, and minimal renal tubular necrosis and abnormalities were observed (15 mg kg−1 BW/day).Conclusions and ImplicationsSM21 had a significantly better safety profile in terms of nephrotoxicity with no major tubular epithelial abnormalities observed in kidney cells and no augmentation of kidney injury biomarkers compared to AmB. Kim-1 and CLU were the most sensitive biomarkers for detection of AmB-induced kidney damage. Future clinical trials should consider inclusion of these novel biomarkers as early indicators of acute kidney injury in antifungal-induced nephrotoxicity.

Highlights

  • Invasive fungal infections are increasingly common in the nosocomial setting (Perlroth et al, 2007)

  • Antifungal Induced Expression of Casapase 3 gene (CASP3) and Hepatitis A virus cellular receptor 1 gene (HAVcr-1) in HK-2 Cells To obtain further insights into the cell damage caused by each antifungal, real-time qPCR assay was used to determine mRNA levels of HAVcr-1 and CASP3 biomarkers of HK-2 cells after 24 h treatment with each drug (Figure 3)

  • Upregulation of HAVcr-1 and CASP3 genes were observed at lower treatment concentrations for Amphotericin B (AmB) and compared with the SM21 treatment group (SM21 and its analogue) and voriconazole

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Invasive fungal infections are increasingly common in the nosocomial setting (Perlroth et al, 2007). Candida species are the most common fungi causing invasive disease in humans and the fourth-most prevalent pathogen of nosocomial bloodstream infections (Wisplinghoff et al, 2004). Of the Candida species, Candida albicans is the most prevalent pathogen, causing approximately 400,000 life-threatening systemic infections worldwide each year in severely immunocompromised patients (Dantas Ada et al, 2015). Treatment options for Candida infections are limited due to drug-related toxicity (OstroskyZeichner et al, 2010; Pfaller, 2012) and the emergence of antifungal resistant strains (Whaley et al, 2017). Candida albicans is the major fungal species associated with superficial mucosal infections such as oral candidiasis as well as systemic mycoses with high morbidity and mortality. The present study aimed to comparatively evaluate the in vivo and in vitro nephrotoxicity of SM21 comparing with Amphotericin B and voriconazole. Sprague Dawley (SD) rat model was used to evaluate the nephrotoxicity in vivo using classical (SCr and BUN) and next-generation kidney injury urinary biomarkers (Kim-1, CLU, ALB, NGAL, b2M, and Cys C) alongside histopathological and immunohistochemical standards

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call