Abstract

e17099 Background: Cytoreductive surgery is the most important prognostic factor in ovarian cancer. To identify in a timely manner the patients who are not candidates for optimal debulking, does not delay and optimize the treatment. Objetive: Identify the presurgical factors that characterize patients in whom optimal cytoreduction is not possible. Methods: Observational study in a retrospective cohort (n = 255) that compared pre-surgical factors between patients with optimal debulking (n = 65) and suboptimal (n = 190). Non-parametric tests were used, a Cox proportional hazards model was constructed and survival curves were drawn by method of Kaplan y Meier. Results: 255 patients were included. 75% achieved optimal debulking. 9 out of 10 evaluated tomography criteria showed association (p < 0.001) with suboptimal cytoreduction. The best cut-off value of Ca-125 to predict suboptimal surgery was 774 IU / mL. Only clinical ascites showed association with the result of the surgery (p < 0.001). There was no difference in complications between both groups (p = 0.267). The rate of optimal debulking has improved over time (p = 0.049). The turn of the surgeries has no impact on the overall survival of the patients (p = 0.792). Conclusions: Objective parameters (tomography and laboratory) should be used to select patients who are not candidates for surgery. The Clinical evaluation without objective parameters is not enough

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call